Set 1
p = 0.04
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.43 dance streak 0.00 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 61 (compatibility 1.7)
skill match 0.54 age match 0.40 appearance 0.17 familiarity -0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
p = 0.99
invitation accepted by Dancer 61 (compatibility 1.17)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 2.48 energy 0.31 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
danced with Dancer 61
Set 2
p = 0.05
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 0.10 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 9 (compatibility 1.46)
skill match 0.44 age match 0.29 appearance 0.14 familiarity -0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
was invited by Dancer 61
p = 0.99
accepted Dancer 61 (compatibility 1.88)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 2.96 energy 0.43 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
withdrew invitation to Dancer 9 (accepted another)
danced with Dancer 61
Set 3
p = 0.05
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 0.20 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 61 (compatibility 1.95)
skill match 0.54 age match 0.40 appearance 0.17 familiarity 0.14 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat -0.10
was invited by Dancer 61
mutual invitation with Dancer 61
danced with Dancer 61
Set 4
p = 0.06
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 0.30 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 61 (compatibility 2.02)
skill match 0.54 age match 0.40 appearance 0.17 familiarity 0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat -0.10
p = 0.99
invitation accepted by Dancer 61 (compatibility 1.98)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 2.99 energy 0.31 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
danced with Dancer 61
Set 5
p = 0.06
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 0.40 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 9 (compatibility 1.46)
skill match 0.44 age match 0.29 appearance 0.14 familiarity -0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
p = 0.97
invitation accepted by Dancer 9 (compatibility 1.29)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 1.56 energy 0.30 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
danced with Dancer 9
Set 6
p = 0.07
waited in Sali
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 0.50 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 9 (compatibility 1.64)
skill match 0.44 age match 0.29 appearance 0.14 familiarity 0.07 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat -0.10
invitation to Dancer 9 lost (recipient taken)
invited Dancer 7 (compatibility 1.29)
skill match 0.24 age match 0.33 appearance 0.12 familiarity -0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
p = 0.98
invitation accepted by Dancer 7 (compatibility 0.09)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 1.61 energy 0.48 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
danced with Dancer 7
Set 7
p = 0.08
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 0.60 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 61 (compatibility 2.12)
skill match 0.54 age match 0.40 appearance 0.17 familiarity 0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
p = 0.99
invitation accepted by Dancer 61 (compatibility 2.08)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 3.05 energy 0.31 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
danced with Dancer 61
Set 8
p = 0.08
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 0.70 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 61 (compatibility 2.02)
skill match 0.54 age match 0.40 appearance 0.17 familiarity 0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat -0.10
p = 0.99
invitation accepted by Dancer 61 (compatibility 1.98)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 2.99 energy 0.31 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
danced with Dancer 61
Set 9
p = 0.09
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 0.80 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
was invited by Dancer 61
p = 0.99
accepted Dancer 61 (compatibility 2.02)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 3.05 energy 0.43 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
danced with Dancer 61
Set 10
p = 0.10
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 0.90 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 58 (compatibility 1.17)
skill match 0.25 age match 0.35 appearance -0.02 familiarity -0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
was invited by Dancer 61
p = 0.99
accepted Dancer 61 (compatibility 2.02)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 3.05 energy 0.43 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
withdrew invitation to Dancer 58 (accepted another)
danced with Dancer 61
Set 11
p = 0.11
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 1.00 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 9 (compatibility 1.74)
skill match 0.44 age match 0.29 appearance 0.14 familiarity 0.07 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
p = 0.97
invitation accepted by Dancer 9 (compatibility 1.39)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 1.62 energy 0.30 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
danced with Dancer 9
Set 12
p = 0.12
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 1.10 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 70 (compatibility 1.28)
skill match 0.52 age match 0.06 appearance 0.10 familiarity -0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
p = 0.99
invitation accepted by Dancer 70 (compatibility 0.85)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 2.67 energy 0.43 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
danced with Dancer 70
Set 13
p = 0.13
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 1.20 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 9 (compatibility 1.81)
skill match 0.44 age match 0.29 appearance 0.14 familiarity 0.14 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
was invited by Dancer 61
p = 0.99
accepted Dancer 61 (compatibility 2.12)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 3.11 energy 0.43 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
withdrew invitation to Dancer 9 (accepted another)
danced with Dancer 61
Set 14
p = 0.14
rested
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 1.30 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
Set 15
p = 0.03
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.43 dance streak 0.00 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.60 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.30
invited Dancer 61 (compatibility 2.12)
skill match 0.54 age match 0.40 appearance 0.17 familiarity 0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
was invited by Dancer 61
mutual invitation with Dancer 61
danced with Dancer 61
Set 16
p = 0.05
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 0.10 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 61 (compatibility 2.02)
skill match 0.54 age match 0.40 appearance 0.17 familiarity 0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat -0.10
p = 0.99
invitation accepted by Dancer 61 (compatibility 1.98)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 2.99 energy 0.31 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
danced with Dancer 61
Set 17
p = 0.05
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 0.20 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 61 (compatibility 2.02)
skill match 0.54 age match 0.40 appearance 0.17 familiarity 0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat -0.10
invitation to Dancer 61 lost (recipient taken)
invited Dancer 58 (compatibility 1.17)
skill match 0.25 age match 0.35 appearance -0.02 familiarity -0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
was invited by Dancer 48
p = 0.99
accepted Dancer 48 (compatibility 0.59)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 2.16 energy 0.43 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
withdrew invitation to Dancer 58 (accepted another)
danced with Dancer 48
Set 18
p = 0.06
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 0.30 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 61 (compatibility 2.12)
skill match 0.54 age match 0.40 appearance 0.17 familiarity 0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
was invited by Dancer 61
mutual invitation with Dancer 61
danced with Dancer 61
Set 19
p = 0.06
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 0.40 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 61 (compatibility 2.02)
skill match 0.54 age match 0.40 appearance 0.17 familiarity 0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat -0.10
p = 0.99
invitation accepted by Dancer 61 (compatibility 1.98)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 2.99 energy 0.31 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
danced with Dancer 61
Set 20
p = 0.07
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 0.50 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
was invited by Dancer 61
p = 0.99
accepted Dancer 61 (compatibility 2.02)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 3.05 energy 0.43 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
danced with Dancer 61
Set 21
p = 0.08
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 0.60 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 61 (compatibility 2.02)
skill match 0.54 age match 0.40 appearance 0.17 familiarity 0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat -0.10
was invited by Dancer 61
mutual invitation with Dancer 61
danced with Dancer 61
Set 22
p = 0.08
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 0.70 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 70 (compatibility 1.55)
skill match 0.52 age match 0.06 appearance 0.10 familiarity 0.07 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
p = 0.99
invitation accepted by Dancer 70 (compatibility 1.18)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 2.88 energy 0.43 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
danced with Dancer 70
Set 23
p = 0.09
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 0.80 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 61 (compatibility 2.12)
skill match 0.54 age match 0.40 appearance 0.17 familiarity 0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
p = 0.99
invitation accepted by Dancer 61 (compatibility 2.08)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 3.05 energy 0.31 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
danced with Dancer 61
Set 24
p = 0.10
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 0.90 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 94 (compatibility 1.06)
skill match 0.10 age match 0.17 appearance 0.20 familiarity -0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
was invited by Dancer 61
p = 0.99
accepted Dancer 61 (compatibility 2.02)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 3.05 energy 0.43 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
withdrew invitation to Dancer 94 (accepted another)
danced with Dancer 61
Set 25
p = 0.11
rested
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 1.00 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
Set 26
p = 0.03
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.43 dance streak 0.00 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.60 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.30
invited Dancer 61 (compatibility 2.12)
skill match 0.54 age match 0.40 appearance 0.17 familiarity 0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
was invited by Dancer 61
mutual invitation with Dancer 61
danced with Dancer 61
Set 27
p = 0.05
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 0.10 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 9 (compatibility 1.81)
skill match 0.44 age match 0.29 appearance 0.14 familiarity 0.14 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
p = 0.97
invitation accepted by Dancer 9 (compatibility 1.41)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 1.63 energy 0.30 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
danced with Dancer 9
Set 28
p = 0.05
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 0.20 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 61 (compatibility 2.12)
skill match 0.54 age match 0.40 appearance 0.17 familiarity 0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
p = 0.99
invitation accepted by Dancer 61 (compatibility 2.08)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 3.05 energy 0.31 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
danced with Dancer 61
Set 29
p = 0.06
waited in Sali
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 0.30 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 9 (compatibility 1.88)
skill match 0.44 age match 0.29 appearance 0.14 familiarity 0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
p = 0.94
invitation accepted by Dancer 9 (compatibility 0.08)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 0.80 energy 0.30 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
danced with Dancer 9
Set 30
p = 0.06
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 0.40 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
was invited by Dancer 18
was invited by Dancer 31
was invited by Dancer 61
p = 0.99
accepted Dancer 61 (compatibility 2.12)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 3.11 energy 0.43 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
danced with Dancer 61
Dancer 18's invitation lost (recipient taken)
Dancer 31's invitation lost (recipient taken)
Set 31
p = 0.07
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 0.50 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 9 (compatibility 1.88)
skill match 0.44 age match 0.29 appearance 0.14 familiarity 0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
invitation to Dancer 9 lost (recipient taken)
invited Dancer 7 (compatibility 1.56)
skill match 0.24 age match 0.33 appearance 0.12 familiarity 0.07 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
was invited by Dancer 2
was invited by Dancer 58
p = 0.99
accepted Dancer 58 (compatibility 1.17)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 2.52 energy 0.43 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
withdrew invitation to Dancer 7 (accepted another)
danced with Dancer 58
Dancer 2's invitation lost (recipient taken)
Set 32
p = 0.08
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 0.60 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 61 (compatibility 2.12)
skill match 0.54 age match 0.40 appearance 0.17 familiarity 0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
p = 0.99
invitation accepted by Dancer 61 (compatibility 2.08)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 3.05 energy 0.31 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
danced with Dancer 61
Set 33
p = 0.08
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 0.70 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 9 (compatibility 1.88)
skill match 0.44 age match 0.29 appearance 0.14 familiarity 0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
invitation to Dancer 9 lost (recipient taken)
invited Dancer 78 (compatibility 1.15)
skill match 0.40 age match 0.01 appearance 0.15 familiarity -0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
was invited by Dancer 2
was invited by Dancer 7
was invited by Dancer 15
was invited by Dancer 18
was invited by Dancer 36
was invited by Dancer 52
was invited by Dancer 61
was invited by Dancer 89
was invited by Dancer 94
p = 0.99
accepted Dancer 61 (compatibility 2.02)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 3.05 energy 0.43 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
withdrew invitation to Dancer 78 (accepted another)
danced with Dancer 61
Dancer 2's invitation lost (recipient taken)
Dancer 7's invitation lost (recipient taken)
Dancer 15's invitation lost (recipient taken)
Dancer 18's invitation lost (recipient taken)
Dancer 36's invitation lost (recipient taken)
Dancer 52's invitation lost (recipient taken)
Dancer 89's invitation lost (recipient taken)
Dancer 94's invitation lost (recipient taken)
Set 34
p = 0.09
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 0.80 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 7 (compatibility 1.56)
skill match 0.24 age match 0.33 appearance 0.12 familiarity 0.07 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
invitation to Dancer 7 lost (recipient taken)
invited Dancer 61 (compatibility 2.02)
skill match 0.54 age match 0.40 appearance 0.17 familiarity 0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat -0.10
was invited by Dancer 2
was invited by Dancer 15
was invited by Dancer 31
was invited by Dancer 36
was invited by Dancer 48
was invited by Dancer 61
was invited by Dancer 69
was invited by Dancer 94
mutual invitation with Dancer 61
danced with Dancer 61
Dancer 36 withdrew their invitation
Dancer 69 withdrew their invitation
Dancer 2's invitation lost (recipient taken)
Dancer 15's invitation lost (recipient taken)
Dancer 31's invitation lost (recipient taken)
Dancer 48's invitation lost (recipient taken)
Dancer 94's invitation lost (recipient taken)
Set 35
p = 0.10
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 0.90 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 50 (compatibility 1.22)
skill match 0.53 age match -0.05 appearance 0.15 familiarity -0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
invitation to Dancer 50 lost (recipient taken)
invited Dancer 18 (compatibility 1.16)
skill match 0.04 age match 0.36 appearance 0.17 familiarity -0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
p = 0.99
invitation accepted by Dancer 18 (compatibility 0.83)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 2.48 energy 0.44 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
danced with Dancer 18
Set 36
p = 0.11
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 1.00 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 69 (compatibility 1.25)
skill match 0.43 age match 0.07 appearance 0.16 familiarity -0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
invitation to Dancer 69 lost (recipient taken)
invited Dancer 9 (compatibility 1.88)
skill match 0.44 age match 0.29 appearance 0.14 familiarity 0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
was invited by Dancer 61
p = 0.99
accepted Dancer 61 (compatibility 0.76)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 2.26 energy 0.43 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
withdrew invitation to Dancer 9 (accepted another)
danced with Dancer 61
Set 37
p = 0.12
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 1.10 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 61 (compatibility 2.02)
skill match 0.54 age match 0.40 appearance 0.17 familiarity 0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat -0.10
p = 0.99
invitation accepted by Dancer 61 (compatibility 1.98)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 2.99 energy 0.31 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
danced with Dancer 61
Set 38
p = 0.13
waited in Sali
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 1.20 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 9 (compatibility 1.88)
skill match 0.44 age match 0.29 appearance 0.14 familiarity 0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
p = 0.94
invitation accepted by Dancer 9 (compatibility 0.08)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 0.80 energy 0.30 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
danced with Dancer 9
Set 39
p = 0.14
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 1.30 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 12 (compatibility 1.24)
skill match 0.41 age match 0.09 appearance 0.15 familiarity -0.21 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat 0.00
p = 0.99
invitation accepted by Dancer 12 (compatibility 0.63)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 2.89 energy 0.24 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
danced with Dancer 12
Set 40
p = 0.15
waited in Miestenrivi
intercept -3.10 low energy 0.49 dance streak 1.40 sociability -0.50 sets since dance -0.30 persona rest bias 0.30
p = 0.94
decided whether to invite
intercept 2.00 initiative 0.16 confidence 0.37 recent rejections 0.00 sets since dance 0.15
invited Dancer 12 (compatibility 1.42)
skill match 0.41 age match 0.09 appearance 0.15 familiarity 0.07 location 0.80 rejection risk 0.00 repeat -0.10
p = 0.99
invitation accepted by Dancer 12 (compatibility 1.11)
intercept 0.80 compatibility vs selectiveness 3.20 energy 0.24 decline cost 0.80 zone accept mod 0.00 previously declined them 0.00
danced with Dancer 12